- home
- trade topics
- trade policy reviews
- list of reviews
- switzerland/liechtenstein 2004
TRADE
POLICY REVIEW: Switzerland/Liechtenstein
15 and 17 December 2004
Concluding remarks by the Chairperson
See also:
>
Press release:
Further multilateral market opening would provide greater advantages
The second joint review of Switzerland and Liechtenstein has been
informative, open and thought-provoking. The two delegations, led by
Ambassadors Wasescha and Frick, have been highly cooperative in their
participation. We have greatly benefited from the perceptive remarks
made by Ambassador Ujal Singh Bhatia, our discussant, and the active
involvement of many Members.
Members commended Switzerland and Liechtenstein on their reforms,
through both unilateral and regional initiatives, while maintaining
the WTO as the foundation of their external trade policies. Members
also appreciated Switzerland's technical co-operation efforts in
favour of developing and acceding countries. The two economies
experienced differing trends in growth since their last Trade Policy
Review (TPR), with employment in Liechtenstein growing rapidly, and
Switzerland slowly recovering from a prolonged period of economic
stagnation. Liechtenstein has greatly benefited from its membership of
the European Economic Area; Switzerland, too, has been taking steps to
further integrate many policy areas with the European Communities
(EC). In this respect, Members enquired about progress in the two sets
of bilateral agreements between Switzerland and the EC, particularly
in harmonizing their regulations on goods, services and movement of
persons. Concerns were expressed about potentially discriminatory
aspects of such regional integration for other WTO Members.
Members noted that Switzerland and Liechtenstein's tariff structure is
complex. Their common tariff consists entirely of specific duties.
Members enquired about plans to move to ad valorem duties and to
reduce tariffs unilaterally, as well as about valuation of goods for
internal taxation purposes. Members commended them for maintaining a
generally low level of protection on non-agricultural products. While
some Members shared the countries' agricultural policy vision, others
emphasized the contrast between their openness in non-agricultural
trade and their high level of protection for many agricultural and
food products. Concerns were raised about broad agricultural policy
prospects and specific measures, including export subsidies, direct
payments, and tariff quotas and their administration through, inter
alia, the "prise en charge" system. Several Members look forward to
progress in Switzerland's agricultural reform. Delegations also asked
when Switzerland would provide its long overdue notifications on
domestic support and export subsidies.
Several questions were asked about Switzerland's technical and
sanitary/phytosanitary regulations, including labelling schemes,
regulations on genetically modified organisms, and environmental
measures; and about intellectual property legislation, notably on
geographical indications. Members commended both countries for not
having taken any trade-remedial actions. Members welcomed the ongoing
efforts made to increase domestic competition, including the
significant reinforcement of Switzerland's Law on Cartels, and called
for greater competition in areas still under monopoly. The importance
of services to the two economies was noted, and questions were asked
about policy developments in telecommunications, tourism, electricity
and gas, construction, and financial services, including the issues of
bank secrecy, countering money laundering and tax evasion.
Members appreciated the responses provided by the two delegations, and
looked forward to receiving written answers on outstanding questions.
This Review has given Members the opportunity to gain a much better
understanding of the policy developments in Liechtenstein and
Switzerland since 2000. The wide interest shown by Members is
reflected in the depth of the interventions, the large number of
advance written questions, and the comprehensive written replies. The
importance of further reform in the two economies on an MFN basis,
both externally and internally, and of greater liberalization
particularly in agriculture, has been emphasized repeatedly. I should
like to thank the two delegations for their willing and cooperative
presence in this meeting, and Members for their active participation.