WTO: 2005 NEWS ITEMS
18 July 2005
WTO COTTON SUB-COMMITTEE
Africans keep up pressure for progress by end of July
A group of African countries continued to press
for progress on their initiative by the end of the month, when the Cotton
Sub-Committee met on 18 July 2005. They said they were disappointed that
other members had not responded in writing to the African Group抯 proposed
搈odalities?
The EU replied that it had responded to the proposal at earlier meetings
and had already formally proposed to 揻ront load?(i.e. act quicker on)
those parts of an agriculture deal that would apply to cotton. The US
described the actions it is taking to get rid of the subsidies that had
been ruled to be illegal in a recent dispute.
NOTE:
THIS NEWS ITEM IS DESIGNED TO HELP THE PUBLIC UNDERSTAND DEVELOPMENTS IN
THE WTO. WHILE EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO ENSURE THE CONTENTS ARE
ACCURATE, IT DOES NOT PREJUDICE MEMBER GOVERNMENTS?POSITIONS. THE
OFFICIAL RECORD IS IN THE MEETING扴 MINUTES
SEE ALSO:
>
press releases
> news archives
> Supachai Panitchpakdi抯 speeches
> Cotton, including the sub-committee
> Mandate
(July-August 2004 framework, paragraph 1.b and Annex A paragraph 4)
> Background
explanations in the agriculture negotiations backgrounder
Trade issues
Benin supported by Mali, Chad, Zimbabwe and C魌e d捍voire, complained
strongly about what they said was lack of progress and other countries?
failure to respond to the African Group抯 揚roposed Elements of Modalities
in Connection with the Sectoral Initiative in Favour of Cotton?of 22 April
2005 (TN/AG/SCC/GEN/2, available
here, summary
here.
揥e have not made any progress. There has been no advance,?Benin
complained. At the same time, prices are falling and the situation among
farmers is deteriorating, it said. Benin said it disagrees with the view
that progress in cotton has to wait for progress in the agriculture
negotiations as a whole.
The African speakers warned that the 33 African countries that produce
cotton will not allow the issue to be sidelined at the Hong Kong Ministerial
Conference in December. They said they were looking for concrete progress
beyond what was agreed in the 1 August 2004 General Council decision and for
this to be reflected in the document to be produced at the end of July.
揥e抮e not asking for the impossible,?Mali said, stressing that the
Africans are not trying to move the cotton issue so fast that it is 搊ut of
synch?with the agriculture negotiations. Mali said that it would not be
enough to have an end-of-July document that contained only the chairperson抯
assessment of the current situation.
Chairperson Tim Groser had said previously that at the end of July he would
circulate a 揻irst approximation of full modalities?in the agriculture
talks, the 揻ull modalities?in turn due to be approved at the Hong Kong
Ministerial Conference in December 2005. More recently, including at the
start of the cotton meeting on 18 July, he has said the chances that he will
be able to produce a 揻irst approximation? as such, are now slim, unless
members?positions narrow in the coming days.
The EU denied that it had failed to respond to the African proposal. Its
ambassador said that he had made a formal statement in the 29 April 2005
meeting, which is now on paper and part of the minutes (shortly to be
released publicly as document TN/AG/SCC/R/3 and available
here.
The 揻ront loading?proposed could include binding cotton tariffs at zero,
eliminating export subsidies and substantially reducing distorting domestic
supports ?all of this right from the first day that the results of the
current negotiations are implemented, the EU ambassador said. The EU also
said countries can act autonomously even before finalizing any commitments
in the agriculture negotiations.
Meanwhile, the US outlined the actions it is taking to comply with the
ruling in dispute
DS267
(揢nited States ?Subsidies on Upland Cotton?. These include administrative
changes to three agricultural export credit guarantee programmes (GSM-102
and 103, and the Supplier Credit Guarantee Programme ?SCGP), and proposed
legislation to alter or repeal these programmes and the 揝tep 2?cotton
programme. Brazil described these are positive moves but added that it is
watching developments and hopes that Congress will deliver the legislation.
(See also news story of Dispute Settlement Body抯 15 July 2005 meeting)
Chairperson Groser described all these comments as important. Among the
points he highlighted were: Mali抯 assertion that the Africans are not
demanding the impossible even though they are speaking toughly; the US
reform of its subsidies, which he said is a 搒ignificant step? Brazil抯
positive response to those reforms; the EU抯 comments, including its point
about acting autonomously even while commitments are being finalized; and
Zimbabwe抯 and Tanzania抯 emphasis on the fact that 33 African countries
share an interest in the issue. But he also stressed that progress is needed
in the agriculture negotiations, and that leaving everything for ministers
to decide in Hong Kong in December would lead to failure: 搚ou know what
will happen,?he told delegates.
Development issues
The meeting also heard a Secretariat report on a consultation earlier the same day, on the development side of the issue, i.e. development assistance provided by donor countries and international organizations. Chairperson Groser concluded that it is clear that the cotton initiative is starting to see action, even though it is slow.
back to top
Next meetings
Tentatively: 30 September, 28 October and 14 November 2005
back to top
Chairperson
Tim Groser, former ambassador of New Zealand, who also chairs the agriculture negotiations.
back to top
Some of the groups
See also agriculture negotiations backgrounder
PROPONENTS: Benin, Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali
AFRICAN GROUP (41 countries): Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Congo (Democratic Republic), C魌e d捍voire, Djibouti, Egypt, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe