- home
- trade topics
- trade policy reviews
- list of reviews
- singapore 2004
See also:
>
Press release:
Economic prospects look healthy although challenges remain
We have had a most informative and constructive discussion of
Singapore's trade policies and practices. The discussion benefited
greatly from the valuable contributions made by Permanent Secretary
Heng Swee Keat, and his delegation, by our discussant, Ambassador
Eirik Glenne in leading the discussion today and by Members of the
TPRB. Several Members have also thanked Singapore for its efforts in
facilitating multilateral trade discussions, especially in the areas
of TRIPS and agriculture.
This, Singapore's Fourth Trade Policy Review, has demonstrated that
its economy remains one of the most open to international trade and
investment. This openness, in great part, has helped Singapore weather
recent economic shocks, such as the Asian financial crisis and more
recently the global economic slowdown, which was compounded by the
SARS crisis and events in the Middle East. Members commended
Singapore's continuing reforms aimed at promoting a competitive
economy that is globalized, entrepreneurial and diversified in the
face of these shocks. Some Members sought further details on the
nature of these reforms, especially efforts to enhance wage
flexibility, employment and training, and to address the challenge of
an apparent recent decline in total factor productivity although I
have noted Singapore's comments in this regards.
Members noted that with international trade amounting to about three
times GDP, Singapore remained committed to a rules based multilateral
trading system. Several Members, however, noted the number of
bilateral free trade agreements Singapore had signed since the
previous Review and asked how it reconciled this trend with its
participation in the multilateral trading system. Members urged
Singapore to maintain its participation in current WTO negotiations.
The representative of Singapore stressed his country's commitment to
the multilateral trading system and responded that its bilateral FTAs
were 揥TO-plus?and could contribute to further multilateral trade
liberalization. Singapore was also actively participating in the
current WTO negotiations and would do its utmost to ensure their
success.
Members raised questions about certain aspects of Singapore's trade
policy, including: customs procedures and trade facilitation; the
difference between bound and applied tariff rates; the use of specific
duties; import licensing policies, particularly with regard to rice;
standards; and Singapore's relatively stringent SPS policy. Questions
were also raised about Singapore's government procurement procedures
and the enforcement of intellectual property rights. It was noted that
Singapore's use of contingency measures was relatively limited.
Since restrictions to international trade are relatively few, Members
were mostly interested in Singapore's recent and ongoing domestic
reforms. Several Members welcomed Singapore's announcement of an
economy wide competition policy to be put in place over the next few
years. While noting that some reforms had been carried out with regard
to government linked corporations (GLCs) held by the Government
holding company, Temasek, Members sought further details on inter alia
揹emystifying Temasek? GLCs and their further disinvestment, measures
to ensure fair competition between them and other private sector
companies as well as efforts to reduce government involvement in the
economy. Questions were also raised with regard to tax and non-tax
incentives and the sectors in which they are currently concentrated.
With regard to services, Members noted major reforms, especially in
telecommunications, and banking and insurance services. They noted
that liberalization of telecommunications services in particular, had
resulted in benefits for consumers and encouraged Singapore to
continue further reforms in other sectors as well. Further details
were requested on banking and insurance, transport, audio visual
services, professional services, and tourism. Some Members also
requested information on Singapore's GATS Schedule.
To conclude, I would like to thank the Singapore delegation on its
oral and written response provided during the meeting and once again
to congratulate Singapore on being an exemplary Member of the WTO and
for its efforts in helping us to better understand its trade related
policies. Our discussions have also helped us to appreciate the
significant challenges facing Singapore today and the Government's
measures to address these challenges.